Jump to content

720S in the flesh


AMT

Recommended Posts

Skipped into Mclaren in Hamilton after work as I found out this bad boy was in for one day only.... christ its only just been unveiled lol Not sure what dealership is next on its tour.

 

Wanted to see if it was as odd looking from some pics but trust me it still looks the wide body beast that a 650S was and then some...and sounds good too! 9c11e3a3f3cdb74c9ae18f9f528ea0c8.jpgb29358d9982f4a25ef4a312bb36587fe.jpg4a94a9bdab45d0245a9d43fc30f28e77.jpg58489f8f3e0af1fca910b2f2531fbd8b.jpg0ab4d6ba9dd3640ffb7e9c8f1118f365.jpg293487af7745b0ed6f44b36b630293f4.jpgf9a7a4542676fb05902145f1e8b1ebd1.jpgde6fd6d2ef206e79d58d724bd709ed87.jpg12ed7cea1685cc102723c9abeabbec70.jpg5c1ba43de4e4612ed792ba07ef5ffc24.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

Edited by AMT
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: I would agree its not 'pretty' like the 650S, the 650 had classic profile, not a lot of fuss, which is what I like, this thing was curves everywhere and not much of a tail if that makes sense, but when you see it in the flesh it works. I like the eye socket things nice and evil but I wouldn't have them a contrasting colour to the body unless it was a dark colour. I'm boring so I'd end up having a deep type of grey... meh The interior is nice but not as swoopy as I would have liked... so right there and then I decided to cancel my order.. :lol: :lol:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never actually noticed now you mention it, it's still big, stand behind it and it looks wide but again thats cos' of the low roof. I agree the 675LT is the best looker so far. This could grow on me though. I think designers will look at more aero designs as we are peaking around performance and they can't do the same 'classic' design all the time... even though I'd kinda like them too with modern bits on it. Looking forward to seeing what the 3 seat McLaren will look like... prob a bit mental judging by this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say it's a particularly good looking car. Supercars always look impressive in the flesh because of the proportions, but it doesn't take a design prodigy to make a car low and wide.

 

That said, I do quite like the bit where the rear 3/4 meets the door - gives it a nice muscular look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always wondered why modern vehicles don't have high top speeds, relative to their 90s counterparts and their lesser horsepower.

 

241mph From McLaren F1 627bhp

215mph for Jaguar XJ220 542bhp

213mph Bugatti EB110 560bhp

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus you need so much more power to go that fast, Chiron has 1500bhp and is limited to 260mph as they can't make road tyres last at those kind of speeds :)

 

And the F1 with its normal lungs got to 391kmh on part worns :)

 

I remember the top gear race between the f1 and veyron. The f1 botty bashed it for a distance.

 

That and the Ferrari F50 I'd sell my soul to own. If I had one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...