Ekona

Lol me and Stu clearly on the same wavelength!

Well, you did, because you said they should have a great big sticker on the side of their cars. Okay, reason me this: What difference is there between the state giving someone a car costing £200 a month, and the state giving them £200 a month to spend on a car that they can top up? How does one cost you more than the other? Not all disabled people are the same, and giving them a choice is a good thing.

So basically, you're saying that if you're disabled then tough luck, you deserve to be singled out as a cripple forever? Dude, I'm as hard-nosed as they come, but even I find that a bit cold. I would rather my tax money go to getting disabled people cars than to anyone who chooses to breed. That's a much bigger waste of money, as they have a choice: I'm pretty sure that the disabled do not.

I agree with Ddcboyle. Give them a certain amount, if they want to top it up then go ahead. If I was crippled suddenly I'd like the choice to drive something fun rather than a generic flid wagon, thank you very much.

...which is why you get my vote bud

I've got two on mine. NNNNNEEEEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWMMMMMMMM Yeah, that quick.

Best not go near The Onion then

It's the Daily Mash.

Not true. Ive told my insurers Adrian flux about both my in car tracker and camera set-up and they note I have it, but that it makes no change at all to my policy. I think what he meant was if you decided to give it a bit of welly somewhere then there's proof of you being naughty, should the police stop you.

That's the risk you take with cameras. They can both help and hinder you. Personally whilst I think it's an important thing to bring to people's attention, I can't help but feel that there is nothing that can be done about it really.

It's a mess. It's almost like the Nismo designers watched the original F&F film and though, "Yeah, that'll do!". It's ugly, awkward, pointy, and it sets the design of the 370Z (which has grown on me, I'll admit) back about 4 years.

Yes, the White is rubbish and the Black is brilliant Seriously, if you want the exact differences look at the chart on the GoPro website. The White is the uber-basic version, though.

Also, you may want to change the title of your thread: It's a safe assumption that something is wanted if you're posting in the Wanted section.

I really hope you're joking. If not, that's probably the dumbest post I've read on here for a while.

Why on earth Rockstar are not being pilloried for releasing GTAV without the online element, I've no idea. If this was EA or Activision then people would be all over them like a case of herpes. Seriously, they've had all this time, so why does it take another two weeks to get the online stuff up and ready? Why is it not ready for launch?

This will make zero difference to anyone.

I'm sure half of you guys in here need glasses. Or stronger ones, if already bespectacled. Or maybe you're colourblind. Or Stevie Wonder in disguise.

Leg. End. Cheers dude!

Burnout plz

LIKE A BOSS

Sweet jesus it's even worse in the daylight *grabs fork* *stabs eyes*

That's a good point really: Anyone who speeds or otherwise breaks the laws of the road really can't complain much about cyclists not obeying the law if they don't bother to do so themselves.

:lol:

You shouldn't be giving cyclists only 4 inches of space, that's crazy. If they catch a wheel on a poor bit of road, or a sudden gust of wind (like that created by vehicles) gives them a wobble-on, then there's every chance they could fall into your car and they could get seriously hurt. I always give them two foot minimum, both for their benefit and mine.