The trouble is that it's all a political game of willy-waving. Sturgeon wants independence at any cost, and will spin and spin to get there. I'm not saying that Scotland on it's own couldn't be more successful, but I don't think it's better placed to go it alone on the world stage than if it remains part of the UK.
If your ideology is to have Scotland stand by itself, then that's fine. If you're prepared to accept any cost for that, again no arguments from me. The trouble for me is that the SNP have yet to present a clear case for independence that covers off all the bases, which leaves people voting blindly in the dark. That's not an acceptable place to be starting from with something this important. Same with Brexit really, no-one was given anywhere near enough facts on either side, hence the clusterf*ck of arguments and unknowns we have now.
If I were Scottish and were keen on independence, there's two very clear questions I'd want answered before voting Yes:
- Which currency will we be using, and what will it be tied to?
- How exactly will we go about forming a relationship (either re-joining or a separate agreement) with the EU?
Those questions define EVERYTHING. The first is obviously mission-critical for the day-to-day working of the country, and the latter is the sole reason that Sturgeon is saying she has a mandate for IndyRef2 (she doesn't btw, as the SNP don't even have a majority in Holyrood and instead are propped up by the yes-men of the Greens).