Ekona

I'm on holiday atm dude, time difference and 12 hours walking around a theme park don't allow much for awesome postings!

No worries.

I hate change. Hate it. Horrible thing. This forum is a billion times better than the old one. Takes 2 mins to adjust your eyes to where the new info is, and that's it. Anyone who says it's worse is wrong. Having to read for 0.00005 secs more to obtain a bit of data that's not actually relevant isn't a design flaw. I mean, who cares who posted the thread? If you've posted in it then it's starred and you can see that way, and if you haven't then surely you just read the thread title and decide if that's something you want to read or not? I love Lexx like a brother, but if he posts a thread about Eastenders then I'm not going to read it regardless. That said, if you want that info then it is there, it's just in a different place. Removing post count for Welcome posts is a genius idea. Also, megalols at Col for the free fiver/tenner comment

How unevenly have they worn? And what alignment did you ask for? A geo setting that allows for completely equal tyre wear (bearing in mind that tyre pressures will also make a massive difference and will be set by you) will also make the car very boring and numb to drive. Can you give us the exact wear number over all four tyres, and both old and new geo settings?

Nah, Steve still has a contract with Honda to pay for the bike, so Honda will just carry on chasing him for the money. His agreement will also say that the bike is not his until the finance is paid off, and that he's not legally allowed to sell the bike before paying it all off, so they could also chase him for breach of contract however that's never going to happen as long as he keeps paying the finance off. Which I wouldn't want to be doing when I don't have the bike any more...

Alignment should really be done annually.

They don't, they're only visible online. Or to the 5-0 on the PNC.

'Cos that'd totally make him likely to not bother following it up at all

I don't do GT-Rs really, but I have to say that even I'd be happy with something like that. GLWTS mate, it's a great car and the perfect example of how to write an ad properly

Right, gotcha. So basically you'd have be driving really badly and/or mis-shift without engagement for it to do anything at all on the upshift. That makes a bit more sense, cheers Matt

Explain it to me then, because I can't see how rev matching (which essentially mimics heel and toeing) works on an upshift. You'd never want the revs to rise on an upshift.

So 39 in a 30 I presume? Video irrelevant really, the law only requires the opinion of a police officer that you were exceeding the speed limit. FWIW I'd have stopped too, grovelled and hoped for the best. Did they actually give you a verbal NIP? Tbh I'd carry on with life and not worry about it, what will be will be. Doing 40 in a 30 is a bit silly though matey, no issues with people exceeding the limit on NSL roads (conditions permitting etc) but very rarely do you get 30 limits that aren't there for a very good reason. Nag over

They have 6 months to lay the info before the courts, so a little while to wait yet. You won't time out of the speed awareness, so don't worry about that. It's not down to you to chase them, so don't be doing that either on the basis they might actually never send you anything further. What was the speed limit, and what were you doing when stopped?

Seriously?! It's only ever going to work on the downshift: You'd never ever want the engine to spike the revs going up the 'box, as the revs are naturally going to drop (so 6000rpm in 2nd might be 4000rpm in 3rd).

Have you tried it on vinyl wrap at all? Just wondering how it compares really.

Awful news mate, don't really know what to say apart from I hope that the future goes as well as it possibly can for all of you.

You can use SiRamik SC15 on wraps, it's good stuff and costs 1/3 the price of that. The trouble isn't finding a product, it's the technique required to put it on: With paint, if you get it wrong you simply grab a rotary and remove it to start again, get it wrong on vinyl and you're ripping that section off as you can't compound it off. Given the cost involved, I'd use SC15 over that stuff. It's good to work with, and no need to spend extra if you don't need to. Bearing in mind you also need the Top layer of that stuff as well...

Can you buy LC on the base S cars too?

Are you talking to yourself?!

Exactly stuff like that, yeah. It's utterly moronic.

Once again, point missed. I do wonder if you're doing it on purpose now. Pay what you like for a car, that's not a problem. The problem is paying EXTRA for a feature you can never really use, unless you like waiting for an entire hour hour to use it. That's what maketh the idiot.

The point isn't the 0-60 time. The point is offering something for a headline figure that, in reality, is just impossible to use. It's something that they should rightly be called out on. If you pay extra for that feature, you're a complete idiot.

So 50 mins for proper launch control then. Well that's great engineering It's like when Top Gear tested the 0-60 of the M6, and timed it at about 5 mins after you faff through all the controls! And that was just following up from a TG video I watched yesterday, and then general research from owners in the US (who definitely don't live in zero degrees!) and they all said that it was that long.

We're not doing next year now, not with all the guff that's going on in LMP1 right now. It'll still be a great week, but I was always going to have a year off at some point to do other stuff (was supposed to be this year!) so I reckon next year seems to be the perfect time now.

In theory, yes. However, GTR owners aren't quite as retarded as Porsche owners in regards to sh*t like this, I don't think.