Ekona

Bargain, no price on smiles

No harness bar on the cage?

Yes but will they pay out when it comes to yours? The views of 319 people: http://www.reviewcentre.com/reviews11381.html They'll definitely not pay out if I have an accident, as I'm not insured with them Switched to Sky this year as I preferred a tailored policy to a generic one, even if it cost me a bit more. I don't trust a single one of those review sites, regardless of whether it's for insurance, household appliances, or Metacritic for games. People only go there with a specific purpose which is to complain, so they only ever give the bad side. No-one wakes up in the morning and thinks, "Wow, I had great service! I'm going to go find a review site and tell the world!". I'll ask on forums and get genuine replies, rather than people with the hump and an axe to grind.

And yet, AdmiEleBell are still miles cheaper than any of the other insurance companies. Given the size of the business and the risk they have to take with regards to claims, I don't think £300M is excessive really.

If it ever happens, I'll send you the video mate.

LIAR Even my missus would. And I'd pay to watch that, too.

Yes there is, unless you've managed to completely destroy the laws of physics. If so, top job!

Red or yellow. Definitely not a purple or pink, and you don't want to be mixing shades of the same colour on a car. Azure blue ones would look pretty tasty though, and quite subtle.

Drop the stubby and the spacers, spend more on the discs and get some braided hoses.

What happens if you go 4 -> 5 -> 6 rather than block changing? If it's okay doing it that way, then you know what my suggestion is going to be... FWIW my old car used to make odd noises when block changing too, so I just stopped doing it.

Are they full coilovers, or separate dampers/springs at the rear as per OEM? I reckon a couple of hundred quid would be about right, could be a fair amount of ballache involved. Don't forget to budget for an alignment afterwards, too.

Were they not coilovers from the factory then? If so, why do the new ones foul the wheels but the old ones didn't? And get those bloody awful neons out of that footwell, ya chav! Aside from that mate, it's looking really good.

I learnt the hard way that if you want a car with FI, just buy one with it in the first place. Unless you like a lot of tinkering and fettling of course, in which case they can be great projects.

I really need to drive one of those. Monkey Harris is getting a drive later on today, so hopefully by the end of play today or maybe tomorrow we should have an idea of what it drives like. Lambo Aventador J is bonkers but now my most desired item ever, and the Bentley SUV is just too ugly for words.

Have a search, loads of info on this around here.

I don't mind one team running away with it, I just want qualy to be a little closer which should make the race more of a battle. Still, it looks like Ferrari are going to be gash for the first few races which is great news

Tarmac, are you sure that rear lateral brace doesn't fit? I only ask I had what looks like the exact same bit fitted to mine, and that was running both a K1 and the stock exhaust. I had no issues fitting that at all, at least with the Summit stuff.

I win Dave To be fair though, the early blades were awful, and the Bosch ones are the first I've come across that were good enough to make me leave the PIAA ones behind. I'd exclusively used them for years, but I don't regret the swap now.

Autobulbsdirect.co.uk Bosch retrofit Aero blades are awesome

Added to the list fella

Awesome Great shot over the river

What, by avoiding an argument in public? Yup, that really makes me the bad guy here, doesn't it? Tell you what, I'll apologise for all my comments if you apologise for going off on one after mis-reading my original post. Fair?

Not sure, I guess that the multicar should revert to a single car automatically and that the insurance co should handle that. Have you spoke to them yet?

Ok well being saying to a woman that it must be her 'time of the month' even in jest may have been ok in the 70's but these days is just plain offensive. That constructive enough? You're quite right Dave, it is. But then, is it any worse than referring to the testosterone flying around, when I don't actually think it was relevant to the point anyone was trying to make? I posted that deliberately to make a point, and it would seem that it was taken in exactly the right context. That said, I apologise if it offended any of the other sprinkles we've got on here, genuinely wasn't mean like that. And as for being a *****, you're spot-on. I consider it to be a badge of honour, more than anything!

My reply: GO *UCK YOURSELF EKONA!!! Love you too darling Posting up PMs is a big no-no too, is it not? Tbh Val if you want to go public I don't care, I was just trying to keep the forum a nicer place but hey ho.