Why does he keep making comparisons to the 987.2 CS if he's actually testing the 987.1? The dynamic changes are massive between 987.1 and 987.2, engines AND suspension.
It's a good review in places, but some of it is just nonsense. How the better everyday car can be the one with half the luggage capacity is beyond me. He slags the 987 engine off for being 'buzzy' and says he prefers the 370 one, yet at the start he calls the 3.7L 'coarse' and 'dull'. Which is correct then?
No offence intended to the OP, it's always good to read stuff like this, but I think this is quite poorly written