davey_83

I cried at the Lion king, another made up story lol

Yes but don't fake scientific discoveries, no need and presents doubt going forward. One in that these things will happen again and two in the fact that the scientific community are essential policed by themselves unknowingly allowing for fake news to be published as fact. Exactly, I chuckle at people's hang ups over logic of the Ark story. And yes logically the matter of survival is impossible and makes the account unacceptable to believe. But wait let's go back, so you accept that all the animals got there by their own account in the first place?

Interesting read. Remembered whatever we've been told, we take it to be true as surely government and the powers at be wouldn't lie right? These items were on display at the national history museum tarted as scientific fact for 40yrs, unti it was conclusively exposed in 1953 as a forgery. Another.... Pretty big players in the news world.... Is it fair to imagine there are more examples....... why hoax something if its true? Think about it, what can be info and credited by science as fact can turn out to be total BS. Evolution makes no sense at. Naturally one species can not give birth to another. One species doesn't change over the course of its life to another, on the global scale needed pedal evolution ie all land creatures. Therefore the concept is BS and not real or grounded with prove or demonstratable in any way. The powers at be have been pushing this agenda for decades and it's stuck. Published scientific facts can be bull as proven above. I know it's hard to take, read for yourself if your bothered. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man

Sooooo happy I don't live in America, they don't stand a chance

So in other news, don't let the silly thumbnail put you off watching and maybe learning. I very much prefer independent scientific experiments.

Should do a pretty fast lap at the nurburgring then?

^ same for me

You in the right place, this video is a good start...

Ello n welkom, great cars!!

Yeah taxing a car in the last week of the month feels pants!!!! Id say a good fair amount of 350z owners that don't live at home, clearly aren't rolling in it. Almost every DE advert both out there and in here promote 'lower tax band'..... Evidently not a complete waste of time it would seem.

NASA would disagree with you sadly.... ----------------------------------- Another small consideration, take this chap - fairly well decorated, at a glance trust worthy, no fool, highly respected, a grafter it's fair to say. Was he and the squad all having the same hallucination? Maybe. Id honestly like you thoughts on the talk Jeff gave.

These don't look like HFC's..... https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Nissan-350z-High-Flow-Catalytic-Convertors-X-2-/392011975039

In your opinion yes

Sorry to hear that last part pal. You can't force someone to love and respect you, has to be natural. Is science bad for forging all the weapon we use in war against one another? No. Man is wicked and has been since day. How do you create something so perfect and have it remain perfect while allowing for complete freewill? That's left to God plan I guess. Mankind has to fully experience the bad to appreciate the good.

Is this something you actually think about and would like answers for? I guarantee you won't get your answers from the periodic table, open your Bible and seek answers yourself.

What logic or proof do you have of God actively doing this to babies? We are not how we were ment to be. We suffer and die sadly, the Bible teaches this sad fact of our existence due to reasons well documented.

The difference is he said he would ahead of time........

I agree wholeheartedly and thank you for your answer. No one is born with faith, folks come to faith differently. There's no hard and fast rule for what this will entail. The same is for when someone looses faith. Evidence is subjective, what is enough evidence presented in a murder case for example might make one person's mind up for guilty and another person of the jury for innocent. Same for a boxing match, all three judges witness the exact same event and can score the fight differently. Very elementary however this is proof that evidence is subjective. This is why I step back from folks that say the apposals show contradictions for the account of the reserection. Yeah and? Some details where different and this is perfectly normal as proven above a part of life. Also how one person would describe an event would be different. That's why police want to eyewitness as many people as they can to a serious crime, why do that if they'll explain the exact same event? They won't and this is fact, hence you'd want as many view points as possible to build a picture. One person could drive a new 911 gt3 and absolutely love it, another person could take it or leave it and fancy a would prefer a Cayman gt4 or huracan performante...... Wow a different view point. For me any contradiction in the Bible is down to man's lack of understanding with the text. Example, some Christian believe the earth to be young, ie a dozen thousand years or so. Some wholeheartedly believe the earth was made in a literal 6 days. Or dinosaurs were on the ark. Or belief in a trinity. From understanding the text more you learn more and see structure. How can one understand text better than another, words are words right. Wrong, text figures mathematics can all be understood greater from one person to another. A average uni scientist for example has access to exactly the same data as a great one, however the understanding can be greatly different. I always try to give a short direct answer without fluff and can also back it up with logic, well in my mind anyways lol Now my position on truth faith. I actively truly to pick holes in the Bible and in other religions, not in the way Dawkins does but to cross reference if you like what I don't understand or what doesn't make sense or just simply doesn't apply to a good person from my point of view. I don't pick and choose elements of the Bible I like, my understanding of the text is different to another follower. The life of jc from what I understand was remarkable and his teaching even today are beyond reproach. I saw JC life on earth as a perfect example to follow. Not to say I can do it, because I can't but to aim towards that. Now for the kicker, IF a person does this and falls short, you still made it. This is exclusive to the teaching of the Bible and from my understanding isn't shown in any other belief. His death has paved the way for all mankind, IF you want it. We are imperfect and this is why this event predates a serval billion humans. You can't fake belief and trust in God and there's that also. As a loving God the above level of acceptance is wonderful. I don't know what lies ahead, no one does for sure however today no I would swap religious views due to scientifically proven or disproven events. And to be fair I ask it of myself (critical thinking) for a nano second and no other view stacks up to me in the way the Bible does. At a glance and to explain my position I'd say for ease I'm a Christian, however I'm not really as I said before. I'm a follower of he that proclaims to be the creator from the Bible and in his son. The above might be the biggest load of tosh you've heard all year, you're welkom.

sorry, i asked if it was proven he rose from the dead?

Why so? I see it as a straight forward question based on what a person look towards in terms of truth. A lot of people don't entertain faith due to its lack of evidence, therefore I asked if the correct amount of proof was given would that be enough? I await the yes/no answer and I kindly ask it of you.

No. I don't believe you know what you are asking. Part of Islam is JC, so if theres no JC as a whole you maybe look elsewhere. Also faith isnt based on scientific knowledge, so my question is relevant to a non believer.

lol Muslims believe in Jesus so................

I don't have a problem at all with microevolution (just a name) its macroevolution, ie a dog changing into a rabbit, a rabbit into a sheep I see no demonstrable evidence for. Again micro affects humans, ie one type of species so no bother there. The bible account for day one of creation, so I don't really see it as modern? What's the origin of God? to answer it wasn't long ago (60 ish years ago) science thought the universe was infinite having always existed, so its ok for that to be fact and yep clear understand but not for God to be the same? #copeout #whenitsuites Science now understands that 'time' can into exist with the big bang, yes a cracker to get ones head around but its out there. With gods, ie god of this or god of that. I believe mythology is just that and accounts for fallen angels, for example Loki is mentioned in the bible. The Egyptian gods, are the same also. The difference is the God of the bible claims to be the creator time space, universe, and us - those don't. Either matter made mind, or mind made matter

If in the not to distant future it was scientifically proven that JC did exist and actually rise from the dead, would you become a Christian?

Its not so much believing a book ie word for word, because yes over hundreds if not thousands of years its been translated, interpreted, edited shorten and then bits added back in so it wont be original version and tbf I don't expect it to be as it simply just cant be. Furthermore I wouldn't be able to read it if it was lol For me when asked the way I view the book is yes its edited, however is it possible for the stories/message along the way to be carried through? You could ask two people, one to read a 1960's Spiderman comic and the other to watch a recent Hollywood blockbuster and the overall story with key points will remain. Who is Peter Parker, how did he come to be Spiderman, where he lives, his job, what does he stand for, is he a goodie or a baddie? All will be same, however the small details will of course change but that wont harm the overall message. Its more so believing in what it represents as a whole for example and if its inspired from a creator? How to know if the Bible is inspired by a creator? Is there anything in the Bible that is from knowledge beyond man understanding for the time? I see many examples and if you look into it one can then make their own choice about it also. I see examples in medicine, healthcare and technology, history all way beyond mans understanding for the time wrote down clearly in the book hundreds of years before science would catch up. Many many Noble prize winners ie fairly smart logical people believe in a creator, so I think it warrants investigation. Religion nor Science claims to make human suffering go away, a lot of the reason as to why people suffer is down to man sadly thinking we can govern ourselves and be our own god.