...bit of a strange one this, I just dont understand how one got off whilst the other got five years? Her testimony in short said she remembers nothing from leaving the club to waking up alone after the deed was done. Both players claimed she consented but the jury found that she consented to one but not the other?
Not doubting the woman, completely, but struggling to see how they have found one guilty but not the other.
http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16212826