Jump to content

We need a grammer and spelling section on this forum!


Recommended Posts

It's a slippery slope mate. :) Having been such a smug twit, I will now feel obliged to check all of my posts over and over again. :)

 

That's a mammoth task for me ... last time I know I made a mistake was 1967 :lol:;):teeth:

which of your children are going to disown you for that statement :lol:

neither ... they started in 1968 ... it was a mistake I made in a fluid dynamics paper I was writing :stir:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a slippery slope mate. :) Having been such a smug twit, I will now feel obliged to check all of my posts over and over again. :)

 

That's a mammoth task for me ... last time I know I made a mistake was 1967 :lol:;):teeth:

which of your children are going to disown you for that statement :lol:

neither ... they started in 1968 ... it was a mistake I made in a fluid dynamics paper I was writing :stir:

 

1967? It's not surprising you made a mistake - it must have been hell attempting CFDs with an abacus or slide rule :stir::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a slippery slope mate. :) Having been such a smug twit, I will now feel obliged to check all of my posts over and over again. :)

 

That's a mammoth task for me ... last time I know I made a mistake was 1967 :lol:;):teeth:

which of your children are going to disown you for that statement :lol:

neither ... they started in 1968 ... it was a mistake I made in a fluid dynamics paper I was writing :stir:

thats one way of putting it :shrug:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1967? It's not surprising you made a mistake - it must have been hell attempting CFDs with an abacus or slide rule :stir::lol:

 

No, it wasn't a problem ... I was using a 256 step programmable calculator that I'd made the previous year :lol:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1967? It's not surprising you made a mistake - it must have been hell attempting CFDs with an abacus or slide rule :stir::lol:

 

No, it wasn't a problem ... I was using a 256 step programmable calculator that I'd made the previous year :lol:

 

 

out of an old transistor radio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1967? It's not surprising you made a mistake - it must have been hell attempting CFDs with an abacus or slide rule :stir::lol:

 

No, it wasn't a problem ... I was using a 256 step programmable calculator that I'd made the previous year :lol:

 

 

out of an old transistor radio

 

RPN no doubt. Pretty impressive forming TTL from discrete semiconductors though. I would have thought a transisitor radio leant itself to analogue computing? Op-amps are minor wonders :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1967? It's not surprising you made a mistake - it must have been hell attempting CFDs with an abacus or slide rule :stir::lol:

 

No, it wasn't a problem ... I was using a 256 step programmable calculator that I'd made the previous year :lol:

 

 

out of an old transistor radio

 

RPN no doubt. Pretty impressive forming TTL from discrete semiconductors though. I would have thought a transisitor radio leant itself to analogue computing? Op-amps are minor wonders :lol:

 

Yea, not easy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1967? It's not surprising you made a mistake - it must have been hell attempting CFDs with an abacus or slide rule :stir::lol:

 

No, it wasn't a problem ... I was using a 256 step programmable calculator that I'd made the previous year :lol:

iPad. Battery is going - 10% remaining pop-up is my excuse on that ;)

 

out of an old transistor radio

 

RPN no doubt. Pretty impressive forming TTL from discrete semiconductors though. I would have thought a transisitor radio leant itself to analogue computing? Op-amps are minor wonders :lol:

 

Yea, not easy

Dang.. I'm going now ^^

Edited by ChrisB
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we send all our posts to ATTAK Z for him to check before we post or just wait for him to read them and PM us any corrections?

your such a prelific posta that I dont think id have time to cheque all you're posts

 

Phew :lol:

 

 

just trying to vet his photo's would be bad enough

 

Trying to see my pics is the bigger problem - Did not get a chance to take the new pile of crap back today, will try again tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just trying to vet his photo's would be bad enough

 

it'll be OK when he's finished his blue period ;)

 

and there's no apostrophe in the plural of photo if you don't mind me sayin' :boxing:

 

unless of course you have put the apostrophe in to signify the missing 'graph' in the shortened form of 'photographs'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at this forum! What it has become ... moderators being off topic, winding people up etc.

 

:lol: :lol:

 

FTFY

 

FTFY2

 

FTFY3

 

Please refer to post 52 above :p

 

I was initially going to let that go, but when Toon Chris made the same mistake as you, I felt I had to respond in my defence ... anyway, let's not fall out about it

 

I'm humbled ....

 

 

To be fair, I'm rather impressed :clap:

Edited by Toon Chris
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twobears is your man ... err woman

 

I've just seen this and feel compelled to point out that I am definitely not a bloke :scare: So stop picking on me Hugh/Huw or I'll extend my house search to your neck of the woods and then you'll be sorry :nono:

You'd be very welcome Annie ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...