Ekona

I think so, yeah. I mean, I like the Evo as a car and I wouldn't hate you if you gave me one (fnar), and I admit my only experience is with the aforementioned 8 FQ300, but I found it a tad harsher, less playful. Definitely quicker, and perhaps a better gearchange, but I found the Impreza to be more slidey and with more feedback.

What coilovers did you order? Who at DT did you speak to when you rang them?

STi, without doubt. That said, I wouldn't have the 2.5L Impreza, I'd go for a 2L but a late one, so you still get the wider track and the DCCD. Basically, exactly the same car we had I prefer the styling of the Evo, and it's definitely quicker, but it sounds rubbish and it's not quite got the same finesse.

Really?! Clearly the man has never tried working on an S3 then

The 2L STi lump is hysterical when properly tuned to about 330bhp. Our old blobeye PPP one would easily keep my 911 in sights on pretty much any road you'd care to mention, it had bags of feel on turn in and with the DCCD you could essentially make it slide on a penny on command. Such a frenetic engine too, one of the all-time greats for me, and with just the right amount of driver involvement that the Evo of the era always struggled to match, even if it beat the Impreza for pace. The WRX has the chocolate gearbox, but the STi is pretty much bulletproof in that regard. I wouldn't own a WRX as the ones we tested felt very tame, but the STi? I'd have another in a heartbeat.

What did you order? DT are usually a tad expensive, but I've never found their service to be anything other than excellent, especially when I've had cause to have a moan.

I'd happily defend myself against anyone. Sex, size, glasses, none of that would come into it. Not that the Thai bloke who kicked her in the head was defending himself at all. mind.

Insurance finally agreed the bill, and it's being repaired at the garage of my choosing next week. Hopefully I'll have her back for next weekend More than a month later, but half of that was taken up with me faffing around with AMCs. If there's one thing I've learnt from this, just let your insurer take care of it as that's what you pay them for. Maybe I'll pay a bigger hit next year on the premium, but at least I get my car back all sorted and looking better than ever. Onwards and upwards!

She looked like a gobby old cow to me. Doesn't mean she deserved a punch in the face, but she certainly wasn't going quietly.

Agreed, I wouldn't look further than the BCs at that price point.

Not my favourite colour, but it's my favourite car so I'll forgive them.

What on earth were the tourists thinking?! That's utterly insane to start anything in that kind of area. Annoyed they might be, but to argue back like that... Well, I don't want to say they were asking for it, but it was spectacularly dumb.

Elephone?! :lol:

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=159&t=1570353

Exactly what I was going to say!

Technic has never about aesthetics. It's about the mechanical side, and the structural side. Creator looks more accurate, but it's much less interesting to build.

Already on the PH GB for one

Same pads I use! And I agree with you about the hex pads, I don't like them for the exact same reason, clogging.

No need to wash after a clay, I tend to use the water on the car to clay with as well after you've rinsed. After all, you're only going to put more wet stuff back on it to clay. That doesn't mean you don't need any QD as well, as the car will dry in places. It just means you need less.

That is the cheapiest, nastiest mesh I've ever seen. £40 to ruin your car? Yeah, sounds a bargain. Honest, if you genuinely like that style just go to Halfords and pick up their mesh for about £10 and DIY, it'll likely be a better job.

It's just a Zunsport one, no? Readily available from the UK.

Amen!

Have you ever driven one? You'd understand then

Having seen the form they wanted you to use, it counted for nothing anyway. If a gazebo falls over it can kill someone, fact. That's a three on their risk scale. If you weigh it down it'll be very unlikely to fall, so that's a one on their scale, giving a score of three on their matrix. They won't let you do anything over a two though! In their example they say a falling gazebo might just injure someone max, not kill. That is utter rubbish. Would you be happy standing up in court arguing you got it right when someone's dead? I wouldn't. Risk assessment is a minefield, and you don't want to be doing it unless you're 100% sure as once you do, it's your neck on the block.

You don't get the choice to go to court or not, your contract with your insurer gives them the right to settle as they see fit. You can push, or you can go it alone, but you can't make them take it to court if they don't want to.