Lincolnbaggie Posted January 11, 2010 Posted January 11, 2010 Purchasing The maths on the Paul McCartney-Heather Mills divorce is as follows: After 5 years of marriage, he paid her £24.3million. Assuming he had sex every night during their 5 year relationship it ended up costing him £13,315 per time. On the other hand……… Leasing New York Governor Elliot Spitzer's hooker, Kristen, an absolute stunner, charges £2,450 per night. Had Paul McCartney "leased" Kristen for 5 years he would have paid £4.47 million in total for sex every night for 5 years (a saving of nearly £20 million!). Value-added benefits are: • a 22 year old • no begging • no coaxing • never a headache • happily agrees to all requests • no complaining • no honey-to do lists • has TWO great legs!! Best of all, she leaves, and comes back when asked. All at 1/5th the cost and no legal fees. Sometimes leasing just makes more sense. Quote
3FIDDYZ Posted January 11, 2010 Posted January 11, 2010 As my old man used to say "If it flies, floats or fornicates, it's probably cheaper to rent...... " Quote
H5 Posted January 11, 2010 Posted January 11, 2010 I got an e-mail version of this with pictures!! Quote
narcotix Posted January 11, 2010 Posted January 11, 2010 LoL Paying for sex is definitely cheaper than free sex ... Quote
bounty78 Posted January 11, 2010 Posted January 11, 2010 Or the morale of the story is..sign a pre-nuptial agreement Quote
Cragus Posted January 11, 2010 Posted January 11, 2010 Hookers are the way forward Thats strange Sarnie....i picked up on the message differently. Hooking is the way forward! Quote
RobD7 Posted January 11, 2010 Posted January 11, 2010 - seriously though losing over £20m to someone you were married to for only 5 years is beyond a joke Quote
3FIDDYZ Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 - seriously though losing over £20m to someone you were married to for only 5 years is beyond a joke Looks like the current govt have taken a leaf out of Heather Mill's book... Looking forward to "divorcing" them! Quote
rtbiscuit Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 i never understand how women get to take so much in a divorce. i always thought you should just get out what you put in. if she bought a house, she can keep it. if all she did was sleep with him, then just pay her the hourly rate for her time. then she gets out what she puts in. Quote
Stew Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 i never understand how women get to take so much in a divorce. i always thought you should just get out what you put in. if she bought a house, she can keep it. if all she did was sleep with him, then just pay her the hourly rate for her time. then she gets out what she puts in. Thats a rather sexist remark..... I'm sure many women have been taken to the cleaners in divorces by men too. I honestly believe that men often make decisions with the 'little' head which have much less brains. Also ,maybe I'm an idealist as I'm not married but isn't there more to marriage than material things and sleeping with your spouse? Quote
3FIDDYZ Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 i never understand how women get to take so much in a divorce. i always thought you should just get out what you put in. if she bought a house, she can keep it. if all she did was sleep with him, then just pay her the hourly rate for her time. then she gets out what she puts in. Thats a rather sexist remark..... I'm sure many women have been taken to the cleaners in divorces by men too. I honestly believe that men often make decisions with the 'little' head which have much less brains. Also ,maybe I'm an idealist as I'm not married but isn't there more to marriage than material things and sleeping with your spouse? Yeh, when you get married you only have the material things... the sleeping with goes out the window!! The more thing is more nagging!! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.