Not much of a bargain really. Its 6 yrs old, basic spec, standard wheels and chavvy looking tints.
Are we in 2009 yet?
52 plate so will be 6 yrs old this year.
Not if it was built/reg in feb 2003!
Makes no odds, to me. If this car was 03 not 52 it would be worth more money.
Loosely translated "Sorry lads, I was wrong..."
No, not at all. My point is valid.
2004/04 zed = £18,035
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/used-pric ... 75&issue=0
2004/54 zed = £18,350
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/used-pric ... 76&issue=0
Therefore the fact that this car was early 2003 makes no odds. Its still a 52 plate and therefore worth less money. It gets lumped with the same with sept 02 cars, which is why I class it in the same money as 2002 cars. Why do you think dealers desperately want to offload cars before a new reg is out? Unloosely translated for you.
You are using Parkers as a guide?!?!?
For what it is worth, new reg plates make less and less difference now to dealers, age, spec and mileage of the car will count more.
I know parkers isn't an exact science but was using it as a guide. I'm talking about the people buying the car not dealers. Speaking to Lambo this week my car would be worth £3k more if it was a 54 plate and thats totally independant of its mileage and spec etc.