Jump to content

Sarnie

Members
  • Posts

    23,618
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sarnie

  1. I would of thought that one of my threads would of been up there with the most posts * *Must try harder
  2. What a @*!# box. Did Zedrush choose the mods?
  3. I thought this got locked? Anyway, I think the car is being sold on Sunday......
  4. You can paypal me £35 if you want and I'll give you access to my photobucket account !
  5. Wasn't the point of this to choose a month not to just choose both?
  6. At this moment in time I'd swap a finger to not have to sell but I'm pretty sure I have to Mods, lock this thread please?
  7. Sorry guys, not been on much the last three or four days. Had some really bad news, which I don't want to go into, which is more likely to involve me selling up asap never mind getting a new car.
  8. You mean the black chrome that only 2 people voted for? Yeah and one of then was me I was the other one
  9. You mean the black chrome that only 2 people voted for?
  10. Thats not quite true is it? I would of came on the Oct run and there was only 12 people there..................
  11. Sarnie

    Lotus Eagle

    Looks like a poor man's Gallardo/R8..................
  12. Not much of a bargain really. Its 6 yrs old, basic spec, standard wheels and chavvy looking tints. Are we in 2009 yet? 52 plate so will be 6 yrs old this year. Not if it was built/reg in feb 2003! Makes no odds, to me. If this car was 03 not 52 it would be worth more money. Loosely translated "Sorry lads, I was wrong..." No, not at all. My point is valid. 2004/04 zed = £18,035 http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/used-pric ... 75&issue=0 2004/54 zed = £18,350 http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/used-pric ... 76&issue=0 Therefore the fact that this car was early 2003 makes no odds. Its still a 52 plate and therefore worth less money. It gets lumped with the same with sept 02 cars, which is why I class it in the same money as 2002 cars. Why do you think dealers desperately want to offload cars before a new reg is out? Unloosely translated for you. You are using Parkers as a guide?!?!? For what it is worth, new reg plates make less and less difference now to dealers, age, spec and mileage of the car will count more. I know parkers isn't an exact science but was using it as a guide. I'm talking about the people buying the car not dealers. Speaking to Lambo this week my car would be worth £3k more if it was a 54 plate and thats totally independant of its mileage and spec etc.
  13. I thought this car got sold weeks ago????? hmmmm..... You're getting worse than Louis - every car that comes up you are interested in! At least I'll put my money where my mouth is for £250 or £450? Depends who's paying
  14. Sarnie

    Driving song

    You just walked past a mirror again?
  15. Not much of a bargain really. Its 6 yrs old, basic spec, standard wheels and chavvy looking tints. Are we in 2009 yet? 52 plate so will be 6 yrs old this year. Not if it was built/reg in feb 2003! Makes no odds, to me. If this car was 03 not 52 it would be worth more money. Loosely translated "Sorry lads, I was wrong..." No, not at all. My point is valid. 2004/04 zed = £18,035 http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/used-pric ... 75&issue=0 2004/54 zed = £18,350 http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/used-pric ... 76&issue=0 Therefore the fact that this car was early 2003 makes no odds. Its still a 52 plate and therefore worth less money. It gets lumped with the same with sept 02 cars, which is why I class it in the same money as 2002 cars. Why do you think dealers desperately want to offload cars before a new reg is out? Unloosely translated for you.
  16. Yep. as long as she is... What if she is a he?
  17. YOU'LL NEVER TAKE MY FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  18. Sarnie

    Driving song

    Nixy's down with the homies, I like it
×
×
  • Create New...