Jump to content

Sarnie

Members
  • Posts

    23,618
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sarnie

  1. Exactly, and it was barely a grand more than the 3.0! Under £300 to be exact. Apologies, I couldn't be bothered to go through the five pages of posts of you not buying a car, to get the exact figure.
  2. I'm never angry. Just intolerant
  3. Exactly, and it was barely a grand more than the 3.0!
  4. I totally agree with this. God almighty....... Lol, love you signature, how about letting others live there dream! Bizarre post considering you've only posted 94 posts! Stuart. Don't know yeh...your probably a decent fellow, but what was wrong with just telling us what you bought in the first place... that was my point, by making everyone start guessing dragged it on a tad. Enjoy your new motor. 95 posts now.. jonny Exactly......it's the dragging out, when everyone called that it was going to be a BMW........AGAIN.
  5. Sarnie

    American Muscle

    28k on a 32 year old car??? How much is it?
  6. That looks like a Rover.....
  7. Oh dear. Somebody needs to man up.
  8. Why would you be less paranoid about having a newer, more expensive, Zed?
  9. Exactly, anything in this price bracket is going to have had circa 15-20 years of mods and abuse..........and will be just waiting to rape your wallet. As the saying goes; Fast + cheap = unreliable Fast + reliable = not cheap Cheap + reliable = not fast If your downgrading for financial reasons, you should be getting a shed. It will be painful for a while but nearly ALL of the cars mentioned in this thread are potential money pits and look like chav chariots.
  10. DID YOU ACTUALLY READ MY RESPONSE? I CAN HELP YOU!!
  11. Did someone say mortgages?? Anyone that needs some help, drop me a mail; info@LT-Mortgages.com Liam
  12. Peeps, I've been looking at a few cars in the circa +/- £10k area, for a weekend/summer toy etc. I've came across a car that is a perfect spec, age, mileage and condition but about £5k less than other cars. The advert states that the car was 'Stolen recovered'. My immediate thought was to walk away, but then i thought; why?? The owner said that the car was stolen in 2004. Insurance paid out and then the car was found. Apparently nothing was damaged eg it wasn't crashed or used in a ram raid etc. So, why would or does a Stolen Recovered car suffer the same stigma as a CAT C or D car? Would you rather have a car that might have been redlined by a scrote for a week or two than at CAT car that you KNOW has been bent round a tree?? If the car was stolen a few months ago and not covered any distance since I'd be concerned. But this was 9 years ago and the car has covered 50k since.......... For reference, the price is £9.5k and a very similar car is currently listed at £14.5k so it seems to be priced accordingly, I just feel like I'm missing something.......... Liam
  13. I can hear Tara's breathing a sigh of relief from here
×
×
  • Create New...