I work as a visual effects artist for feature film, so like the rest of my colleagues I was also intrigued to see the film in HFR (not to be confused with camera shutter speed or tv refresh rates). I knew in my mind what it was going to look like (shite) and unfortunately it lived up to that expectation.
Film is cool once it gets going but HFR is diabolical.
IF you are a bit of a geek - have a read of this:
http://masterzap.blo...rame-rates.html
I can say I'll happily watch it again, albeit at normal 24fps, and not in 3d either (although I think it's just converted to 24fps, so motion blur will still be lacking I think).
But to quickly summarise why I thought it looked bad:
I expected Benny Hill music to come on in some shots, as it looked sped up !
It made the film look like a pantomime and a TV kids show at the same time.
It's probably something most folks won't consciously be aware of until you have a direct comparison side by side.