ilogikal1

This shed.

I'm not too fussed who wins the championship really. So long as it's not Seb. Or Ferrari. Or Nico. Or Alonso. Or Maldonado. Or Sauber. Or Manor.

So what you really need is some sort of helmet guttering then?

As I understand it, power is calculated by taking a measurement of the full width of the spoiler from end plate to end plate multiplied by the spacer size, right? It explains everything...

Is it done yet? How about now?

You'd never cope with the increased performance. It'd throw you in a ditch before you got to work.

Don't worry Grundy, I'm on your side on this one. I'm not paying Sky for the privileged though.

Lots of disrespectful people at that Grand Prix. Bloody drivers thinking they're too good to not wear hats! :scare: And look, one of them is even DRINKING!! :scare:

Good grief!

It could well have been heavily strategy assisted - Ferrari certainly got that right today - but they also appeared to have some performance to match the Merc today, which was good to see. Hopefully that competitiveness is not just the case at the high tyre degradation tracks, as Mr Brundle questioned - who raised the issue of tracks like China where the issue is getting heat in the tyres. Looking forward to the next race to see how it unfolds now. I'm almost a little bit amused that Manor ultimately finished better than McLaren in the end too. It seems to be common opinion of those at track-side that McLaren have progressed and might be "satisfied" by that performance, but I just don't see it yet. Yes, there was less of a gap in qualifying, but the two qualifying sessions aren't exactly directly comparable now are they? And ultimately that "performance" is still embarrassing. They've got a long way to go yet!

I'd go with blue logos myself, as you say it's a better contrast. Looking forward to seeing them on the car though.

Well, that was better than Melbourne.

I agree with this, but... If the airline was aware that he'd been medically signed off work and acted upon that, he wouldn't have been in the cockpit at all, regardless of his motives. That said, I appreciate that even if (and that's still a big if with today's journalism!) what has thus far been reported is accurate it's still far from the full story at this point and other flaws in the system may present themselves.

You know it'll be Jenson! Or were you talking about the front of the grid?

It's not too shabby. It's effectively (well actually it is) GTechniq C1, so applied correctly it should easily see 18months+ out of it. It's not the worst choice.

Cheers buddy. With any luck the rest of the car is just as shiny smooth (give or take eleventy million stone chips). Except the front bumper that is.

Kranzle are the Volk wheels of the pressure washer world to the Rotas that are Nilfisk and Karcher.

This. If what the news is currently reporting is accurate (if!) - that the co-pilot had a torn up doctors note signing him off work in his home - the problem in this case is caused by his employers either not knowing about this or disregarding it. That's not something that's going to be resolved with remote control planes or a cram-as-many-people-as-you-can-into-a-cockpit competition.

Buy the SSQV then save up for the turbo. Job jobbed.

I use... well, this; http://www.350z-uk.com/topic/82410-the-ilogikal1-test-thread/ A recent thread on this topic though; http://www.350z-uk.com/topic/94989-recommend-me-snow-foam/ Or to summarise (my recommendation, not the thread); Bilt Hamber Auto Foam, Car Chem Snow Foam or Auto Finesse Avalanche. Just pick the cheapest at the time.

They might just work next door to a trophy shop.