GC350z

According to www.themustangnews.com the owner has a number of Lamborghini’s already. Loads of cash, bored, why not. Wonder what people state side think of it? Mods - are we allowed to discuss this Lamborghini/Mustang abomination?

Find a site you like or use regularly to order stuff from. Have a look at the bottom of the page. There is likely to be a product name or provider if the complete site is hosted by one of those companies I mentioned. Ordered stuff from these guys two days ago. www.cleanandshiny.co.uk Had no problems ordering from them. Was no option to pay through paypal. Quick look at the code reveals it's using this www.cubecart.com Guy

If you need this quick then I'd suggest buying something off the shelf or finding an online host that provides ecommerce templates. Plenty of php based online systems available that will provide paypal as well as credit card facilities. You just have to customize the front end and upload your products to the backend database.

Here's one for you Sarnie. Lets say it did have lambo doors and you didn't buy it. With the 430 cost 35k more and now ruled out what else would you of considered?

That's just your oppinion. Everyone buys for different reasons. Some would buy on badge alone, e.g. Would as many people buy the G if it had a Skoda badge on it? It is Audi based when all said and done..... Obviously just an opinion. Worth noting. VW owns Lamborghini, Audi and Skoda (as well as Bentley, Bugatti and SEAT) For what it's worth I've never driven either the Gallardo or the 430. For looks I'd want the G but truth be told I don't think I'd buy one (If I could afford it). For me it just seems wrong not to have Lambo doors on it.

In the real world it’s going to be looks, handling and comfort. Performance isn’t really an issue as both the Lamborghini and the Ferrari are fully loaded. It’s really going to come down to how you feel behind the wheel.

I just shocked that he knows the lambo is 4wd.

Perhaps he's joined a Ferrari forum and is busy whoring it up over there.

Again you have interpreted my post into something completely different. "logic employed in this thread" does not mean "you don't like this thread" or "you don't like where this thread is going".

Seriously how old are you? Do you even understand what I said? "logic employed in this thread" How on earth did you translate that to "you don't like this thread"?

Based on the complete lack of logic employed in this thread I've decided I'm no longer going to support McLaren or their drivers. If Hamilton ever decides to leave I'll begin supporting him again. Until such time I’ll cheer his misfortune.

He's got to be joking.

£946.99???!! Guy is loaded so don't worry about it If I was loaded mate I'd be driving a Lambo like you The last 04 I saw for sale here a few months back cost close to €200k

What the ****. Who said they didn't use the info? They fact that they had it and could of used it is all that matters. If it is proven that Renault were also in possession of the same info they will receive the same punishment.

If he cant he should give up the car and use public transport.

The troll needs to go back under a bridge. Couldn’t care a less if she likes the Z. Would never buy a car based on a review.

It's great when you guys bitch about road tax. €1343 a year and they are putting it up by an estimated 10% next month. Happy days. Living in Ireland rocks.

Get yourself a set of 06 clusters. Much better.

Unbelievable! Is this a bad thing or good? Cant decide. Bad obviously but result with him accepting responsibility. Anyone feel bad for the 25 year old hitting a Lambo of all cars? As Sarnie has it totally covered I kinda do feel bad for the muppet.

Totally agree, and Renault should also be punished after the latest findings. We have to wait for the findings. It could be that Ron or whoever was a little pi**ed off in the hearing back in August when it was blurted out but it might of been a misunderstanding. I don't agree with the idea of punishing Ferrari. It’s hard to explain my reasoning but will try. Lets say we both work in telecoms. You worked for Nokia and I worked for Samsung. Now if I passed on info to you of our latest circuits that was smaller, faster and more efficient that anything Nokia or Samsung had before I would be the one punished for leaking it and you and your company would be punished for possibly using it. My company did nothing wrong apart from hiring a no good thieving bastard like myself. If it had been the other way round and it was yourself that leak the info to me then the opposite would apply. Not a great example I know. Guy

Quote from Maximilian (very james bond) at Strosek. Rear costs €714 ex vat. Cheaper then US. I do like it. I'm thinking Strosek rear bumper with integrated diffuser, C west from lip/diffuser if they make one for the 07, Nismo exhaust and spacers to position the GT4 wheels where they should be. Guy

Strosek only do parts for Cayman (987), Cayenne (955), 911 (996), Boxster (987), 911 (997) and the 350z. Found the rear bumper online priced at $1,195 plus shipping. Waiting to hear from Strosek themselves for a price. Hoping it'll be cheaper as they are based in Germany and the online price is in the states. Guy

There's no GTR or V-spec of that shape skyline. If you've found a twin turbo model it's one that has been done aftermarket. Guy