doesn;t mean they use it. i know for a fact that some of the old race teams used to be sponsored by people like castrol, stickers all over the car etc; but if you actually looked in the oil sump, you'd find that most were running mobil 1, regardless of what the stickers on the outside say.
plus being a ferrari owner doesn;t get you a discount at shell either.
and i'f pretty certain there is no sticker saying, only fill with shell.
it just happens to be that shell gave ferrari a big advertsing cheque and told them to tell everyone that its their fuel of choice.
What about the claims that the furl has been partially developed by Ferrari, due to their input? Real or fake? Because that would be a seriously big lie which could damage both companies.
it makes no claims to how much input they have, it could just be a bloke turns up at shell sniffs the fuel and says "yep that smells good enough for ferrari"
you may well be right and they tested it with ferrari engines. but the point i'm getting at is don't be sucked in by advertising. what they say and waht they do are very often 2 very different things.
I know, but I can't be completely sceptical about everything, otherwise I'd have a very boring life.