MacW

Post this exact same request for advice on PistonHeads, leave the jackals to chew on it for a couple of days and then show the thread to your relatives. Should be a decent dose of cold water and might possibly even drag them back into reality.

Indeed, can't help feeling they've cheated slightly by calling it a Leaf

User control panel | Board preferences You've been playing after drinking again haven't you?

Is any of that in English? Wibble...

Ta muchly!

Also not a fan of the rear bumper and it's a little too low for my taste but it's a nicely presented Z. Quite fond of that spoiler too, not seen one like it before. Anyone know what it is?

You must be one of the Premium Facebook members that they actually follow around on a 24/7 basis then. It's the only explanation that makes sense /nod

Someone you are friends with is friends with the garage on FB. HTH.

39. Just got the K2 on at the moment and would like a bit more noise, luckily I'm booked into Abbey next month for Berks HFCs, XYZ y-pipe, Motordyne plenum spacer and a remap Should growl a bit more after that.

Superb Although from the looks of things there are entire colonies of flying insects that now hold an image of your Z to represent the Grim reaper

Right on buddy!

But that itself is followed by 268, which has this within it: "In congested conditions, where adjacent lanes of traffic are moving at similar speeds, traffic in left-hand lanes may sometimes be moving faster than traffic to the right. In these conditions you may keep up with the traffic in your lane even if this means passing traffic in the lane to your right." Indeed. There's no legal definition of "congested", it could be one car causing congestion by being in the wrong lane. The fact that the Highway Code states you should only overtake on the right does not make it illegal to overtake on the left, just not desirable. As long as you are not breaking any laws (speeding etc) then passing traffic while driving in the inside lane is not inherently illegal.

That would be a fun one to bring up in court

/nod Although you'd have trouble arguing your case if lane 3 was available in this example. If the inside lane is clear and all outside lanes are full of slow morons then you're well within your rights to overtake on the inside.

+1 It's your car, it's your responsibility to make sure the driver is insured. It's the test pilots responsibility to provide the proof of that insurance. Make it clear in the ad that they will need to bring the insurance docs if they want to get behind the wheel.

I think as well this is an important point...did someone drive without a seat belt, yes or no? Its a clear cut decision. Parking, were you over the line? Yes or No, clear cut. Undertaking, some are dangerous and need fining, some are though not so citing the example of a slow mover on the outside lane with two empty lanes inside them. Stick to the Yes No's for the police, things which are argumentative such as the undertaking example must go to a court, as invariabley most will in any case so we waste more time in the long run. Time spent with the police issuing fines and time wasted in an appeal court will always outweigh the current system in time and cost. This

Very, very nicely done mate

Diesel generator or hotwire it into a street lamp

Some useful info here guys. Really just posting so I can find the topic in the near future when I get my own DA

Great to hear it's worth watching, I've been really looking forward to seeing it

I'd have to say the Camaro Out of curiosity, which hire company are you using?

I know how you feel. My company's been scrabbling around redistributing global stock to try and stretch out the availability while we wait on our factories to wind back up to speed again.

You could have hoovered the inside first

Looks superb mate, hopefully doing the run down to the south of Spain for Xmas this year, funds permitting Tomas, what have you done to your front wing?

Rubbish! Those are quite clearly 350Z headlights