Although I mainly listen to mp3's in the car, occasionally it makes a change to see what the radio has to offer.
However, since changing over to a stubby aerial it has been a bit hit and miss whether I could hear the station I wanted without a lot of background noise and fading.
One of my hobbies is amateur (ham) radio so messing about with antennas (sorry aerials) is something I am pretty familiar with. So I decided to compare the original bee-sting aerial with the stubby using some radio test equipment I have.
Sorry if this gets a bit technical...
Because the bee-sting is over twice the length of the stubby it captures more signal, but the biggest difference is in the bandwidth each covers. Briefly the FM band is from 88MHz to 108MHz, and the bee-sting has two peaks in it's performance, one at the lower frequency end (88MHz) and one at the top of the frequency band (108MHz).
The overlap in these peaks mean that it covers the FM band well.
However, because of it's much shorter length the stubby is sharply tuned only to the top of the frequency band (around 98MHz), which means stations on other frequencies are received very much weaker.
Although the stubby looks better on the car I find that it performs about as well as a "Chocolate Fireguard".
So the bee-sting is back. I guess you pay's your money, and takes your choice.
Cheers
S.