Flyeye tints. Anyone used them

[Angrybiker]

Was thinking of tinting my rear lights and have seen pictures online of flyeye tints. Never seen them in the flesh tho, any1 got any experience with them? Any good?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HAMLNJ]

If your just doing your rear lights, why don't you try doing it your self with some you tube vids? Even if you mess up won't cost must until you get it right.

[Angrybiker]

I had been thinking about the headlights as well but since they barely light the road as it is I don't think it's a good idea

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[AliveBoy]

The fly eyes stuff doesn't really work on the z rears as they curve too much and the fly eyes stuff doesn't stretch much. I've done it on my indicator lights on the rear and it looks good

[hensh65]

Check my build thread mate. Dont do the front as it really does cut your beam down. The rears look good

[Mudman]

I had some on the car when I bought it - The previous owner put it on the interior rear and side windows. Impossible to clean was my first de-mod

[coldel]

Used it on mine, rears were quite easy with a little bit of heat.

 

Here is mine with it on the back

 

[Angrybiker]

Looks good. Think I'll give it a go.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[scobie140]

I've got them on the rear. Looks @*!# up close but fine from afar. Traffic police were a bit iffy with them when checked recently, however never gave me any tickets etc. Just told me they are restricting the reflectors and the light beam. But got through 3mots with them

[veilside z]

Lamin-x is what i use. Not the cheapest but the best quality.

[berty04zed]

Got mine done at Tint Centres £40

 

 

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

 

 

[Ricey]

One of the most god awful looking mods out there IMHO

 

Get a can of tint instead

[Ekona]

As I've said before, when a car comes into the back you at night, good luck explaining to the insurance company why you have material covering up 30-50% of your lights.

 

Common sense should dictate that reducing light output is never a good idea, no matter how good you may think it looks. That said, as long as you're happy with the risks then there's no doubt it's a very effective way of getting the result you're after

[coldel]

Funnily enough the company that sells this stuff 'claims' that it doesn't reduce light output due to its technology (although doesn't actually explain what this technology is apart from making up a few other words that end with 'ology' - I put some on the front and for sure did reduce output, I would estimate by around 40% - its basically a plastic black material, by default it MUST absorb light being projected at it.

 

Took mine off after a few weeks.