The problem is, the people at the top are taking huge £250k salaries and the people on the ground, doing all the work standing in the cold rattling a box are getting nothing.
Err, they box rattlers normally get a %, not that I begrudge them.
Definitely disagree with the top boys getting so much BUT and it's a big BUT if they are bringing the money in is it justified. Comes back to the arguement of attracting the right person to do the job. I agree on principle that they shouldnt earn that sort of money but to do that sort of role I'd want 100k easy just for the stress. But if I had no financial burden I'd do it for free but probably not full time. I lose my point, if I had one, there might be one in there, possibly.
Dan I think that Cat charity has too much money given the quality of that gift.