coldel

EV is cleaner, but not clean. We can as a species cut down on harmful environmental damage but it will always be there in some shape or form which is what I would guess the cartoon is hinting to, that some EV owners think they are 'clean' when in fact they are just 'cleaner' than the common alternative, just not clean.

If you can secure a spot down the side of the car park (not out on the street) as per previous years I should be ok for this

Yes shocker that, he was still working and was on TV doing interviews the other day. Then bang gone. One of the good ones.

Also try not to listen the Facepack crowd where some seem to think these devices let them go faster, change fuelling, remove gear restriction etc.

The throttle controller does exactly what it says on the tin, changes the input of the throttle, it doesn't do anything particularly clever. As afro said, just press the throttle less

Sold - thread locked

And how would that ever be proven? But for debate sake assuming it could be - him coming back to life (as many people do nowadays actually where they spend time without a heart beat) doesn't prove all the other miracles we observe in the writings or the existence of god who created all things. So, would you move over to the true religion?

Would I believe in Christianity because science proves Christ exists? No. Because that doesn't prove all the miracles that claim to come with it do also - like we discussed before although the Ark was the right dimensions, boats had been in existence long before that event apparently took place as well as divine intervention sorting out stuff like starvation and drought on board. I suspect there was activities going on at the time which made people desperate for something to believe in create something bigger and more sensational around those activities. So, am I understanding correctly you would believe in something even if it was shown to be based on a falsehood and in fact shown you had chosen the wrong faith where another was shown to be true?

In short and trying to simplify the questions then, even if JC was proven not real, and say Buddha was - you would still be Christian and not become a Buddhist? If not then so it wasn't fair to ask above someone else to believe in Christianity if he was proven to be real?

So would you stop being Christian and become a Muslim?

I guess the bigger question is if in the near future it was proven Christ wasn't real and the prophet Muhammad is real would you turn to Islam?

Hi mate, I bought an Apeman from Amazon with loads of accessories for about £70 https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B01JS00NFE it comes with a spare battery as well which is very handy. Here is a vid of me in the shark tank London aquarium the other day. Change the settings to 720 (it defaults to 360) - I filmed it in higher resolution but YT seems to drop it to 720 for some reason. I haven't owned a go pro before so no comparison to work against but for £70 its something which if you lose it you could swallow the cost a bit better than hundreds for a go pro!

Would I buy a DE over an HR for the road tax difference of a few hundred quid - of course not, that's slightly absurd in my view. Its worth paying the difference for the dipstick location alone..!

Agreed you need as much tactile control as possible - you should be spending the maximum amount of time looking out the window not trying to find a control on a touchscreen device.

Although technically not car related, I know Dan @Ekona you asked about the Apeman camera I bought as a cheap option to a go pro. I have to be honest, never really used it much (will do on the upcoming euro road trip I am sure) until last weekend when I decided to snorkel in the shark tank at London Aquarium! The camera came with a waterproof skin you could put the camera in (I did test it under a tap at home before entrusting it to safely look after the camera in the tank!) for underwater shooting, and I have to say given the camera and all the accessories cost something like £70 am happy with the quality of the video it returned. I recorded it in higher definition but YT only lets you go so far for some reason when uploading it 1080p. https://youtu.be/32kQGh-nkos

Chuck Norris counted to infinity, twice.

This agent is x10 more powerful and only needed in tiny doses to achieve the result. Although there are some oddities around the whole thing, if its so lethal how comes nobody concerned has actually died yet. Something like 1 part in a million absorbed through the skin can kill you in minutes, how did any exposure results in people getting ill but not dying? Also how comes if it was so dangerous that the guys car was stuck on the back of a flatbed by people wearing jeans and t-shirt so on and so forth. So much of this doesn't add up for me and I am not normally and conspiracy merchant!

Fair play the chap had a go - he could have booked a flight but remember commercial aircraft have curved plastic windows to fool you into thinking the earth is round so not to be trusted

Would it be beneficial for one of the old Soviet countries to do it? I think the Ukraine might like to see the West unite against Russia would it not? Sure the nerve agent would have been produced in Russia, but could have been sat anywhere for years and changed hands on a black market which is highly prevalent in Russia. This is why the phrase 'highly likely' is always in any comms rather than 'they did it'.

Trump just needed an attractive and flirtatious former associate to seduce and subversively deliver the nerve gas to the chap in question...

...and the Russian guy that pretty much invented the suspected nerve agent defected to the US and lives there. Pretty sure as part of the deal he would have had to divulge how its made, all the secrets of delivering it etc. The plot thickens...

Heres a conspiracy theory for you. Trump did it. How better to deflect an FBI investigation into collusion with Russia than to show your solidarity with an ally against Russia

That an old soviet era building, poor equipment and substandard regulations are in place in a more remote part of Russia and that anything from an electrical fault to a cigarette could have ignited a fire that torched the building? Like how Grenfell grabbed me actually.

Do you infer that our government do care? We armed what was to become IS ourselves because at the time it served our interests to bring down a government we didn't like, it has come back and bitten us right on the backside but the government swept that under the carpet. We went into Iraq with our pals from the US but then once we smashed and removed their governing body did little to put anything else in place allowing warlords to enter into a battle of power where tens of thousands of civilians have been displaced or killed. The US have been running invasion training sessions a hundred miles from the coast of North Korea for decades and we wonder why they have continued to pursue nuclear weapons. There are no goodies and baddies here, we are as guilty as Russia of committing gross acts of human demise either directly or indirectly, we are all baddies in most modern conflicts unfortunately.

It was inevitable there would be an accident - the location of wheels and engine was a design fault. There was one at Brooklands a year or so ago, you could go for a look around it, was very cool getting on board and taking a seat!