Jump to content

Does Final Drive or Lightweight Flywheel change require Remap?


Danohosko

Recommended Posts

Simple question,

If i change the final drive on the z (for a shorter ratio), will it require a remap or would it possibly mess with the traction control? If it thinks it's accelerating faster than it should be?

 

Dan

 

Edit: Also does a lightened flywheel require a remap or mess with traction control?

Edited by Danohosko
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple question,

If i change the final drive on the z (for a shorter ratio), will it require a remap or would it possibly mess with the traction control? If it thinks it's accelerating faster than it should be?

 

Dan

 

Edit: Also does a lightened flywheel require a remap or mess with traction control?

 

no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple question,

If i change the final drive on the z (for a shorter ratio), will it require a remap or would it possibly mess with the traction control? If it thinks it's accelerating faster than it should be?

 

Dan

 

Edit: Also does a lightened flywheel require a remap or mess with traction control?

 

Just out of interest why do you want to swap for a shorter final drive? Typically in NA tuning you would go for a longer final drive ratio to improve in-gear acceleration. Eg from 3.5 to 3.9.

Is this what you mean or really you want to shorten the ratio eg from 3.5 to 3.3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking shortening so going from 3.5 to 3.9 or 4.08. That's shorter right?

 

Not sure how substantial the gains are but seems a popular mod in the US from what I've read. And also the current gear ratio has like 20mph wasted above the limiter so might as well try and claw back some of that and turn it into acceleration :) not worried too much about fuel economy, i'll buy a smart car when i start to worry about petrol...

And i don't fancy stripping out my nice comfy but heavy leather seats to shed wait haha.

I reckon it must be cheaper than spending £'s on engine mods to get the same sort of acceleration gains though. (I looked into it a little last year but not much)

Edited by Danohosko
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking shortening so going from 3.5 to 3.9 or 4.08. That's shorter right?

 

Not sure how substantial the gains are but seems a popular mod in the US from what I've read. And also the current gear ratio has like 20mph wasted above the limiter so might as well try and claw back some of that and turn it into acceleration :) not worried too much about fuel economy, i'll buy a smart car when i start to worry about petrol...

And i don't fancy stripping out my nice comfy but heavy leather seats to shed wait haha.

I reckon it must be cheaper than spending £'s on engine mods to get the same sort of acceleration gains though. (I looked into it a little last year but not much)

 

Nice one mate! I suspected that is what you want to do but there is always that numerical disparity and what affectively happens and this causes confusion. You actually lengthen/increase the ratio with a shorter drive and lowe/shorten the ration with longer drive.

If you are going to stay NA and would install an LSD at the same time it's worth it but by itself it's not cost effective.

You will be gaining 10-15% more acceleration per gear with the 4.08 but also = poorer economy potentially = reduced rear traction theoretically on launches = useless first gear as you hit redline too soon etc

Most of this can be mitigated with good grippy/wider tyres, adding the lsd, launching from 2nd and short shifting.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3.9 would be perfect. If your car is the UK GT the you have the factory VLSD. It's ok but I bet you given the age/mileage it's not as effective any more. If you I doing the FD then stretch and get an aftermarket LSD like Kaaz, Quaife, cusco, nismo etc. I think Clarkmotorsport did a GB on the kaaz not too long ago. I have an lsd and it's just immense. I didn't change the FD because I was going FI but in retrospect I could have done a 3.7 and be ok for traction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3.9 would be perfect. If your car is the UK GT the you have the factory VLSD. It's ok but I bet you given the age/mileage it's not as effective any more. If you I doing the FD then stretch and get an aftermarket LSD like Kaaz, Quaife, cusco, nismo etc. I think Clarkmotorsport did a GB on the kaaz not too long ago. I have an lsd and it's just immense. I didn't change the FD because I was going FI but in retrospect I could have done a 3.7 and be ok for traction.

 

Yeah ive got a UK GT so should have the LSD already :) ten years old and 66k miles now so no idea how good it is now, gonna have to do some more saving up i think!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...