StevoD

well the car aint done @*!# for me in 2 years Maybe grund will have more luck

look what youve started again Aliveboy

Poor Grundy Wait Grundy why you carrying that rope up a tree

Dont Hate on the skillz Bruh!

Secret

Silly Moutwash, Why else would he have GM in his username? GrahaM i just thought he really liked chevrolets

There are plenty more where they came from Just kinda funny as you're the king of 'I don't know what to do please help me' threads. i can see where this is going

seems a nice chap

i think no one notice none of these cars had no brembos

RWB edition 350Z

trust us learn from grunds mistake

Well arent you a little ray of sunshine the morning

o right ok i get ya,

arrr Whackywill your a motorsport kinda guys tell who do you think is going to be at the top of the next round of the BPSTC Eon Or Scottish power

Lets open a new can of worms. It's not road tax, it's "vehicle excise duty" road tax finished in the 1930's. Any way mr dedman is to blame for this

Jobs a good un I don't mind ANYONE on the roads whatever they ride/drive as long as a. They are respectful of others b. They don't don't get in my way * if the rider/driver is female with big tits then ignore the above Hello Dave

noooo its all come to an end as your turned up this could have been brilliant

I wasn't actually referring to your post mate regarding that comment, anyway what i mean is that with a piece of software you buy the license and you have full control of that particular bit of programming, but with the up-rev (at least with a straight remap, and to a similar degree with the full software) you buy a license and the remap but have no further access to that software, and i know that the license gives up to three remaps for each license, and like i said when i considered buying the software/license i was put off by the fact that if i wanted to use it on another car that i owned i would still have to buy further license's. is that right as i know abbey bought some licenses back didnt they why couldnt you just transfer it

I said they dont pay VED, not they dont pay emissions tax. Mouthwash, I still dont know what youre on about. You have no idea that you mentioned something irrelevant (power stations) as not paying emissions tax (which they do) and then facepalm that they don't pay VehicleED? How many power stations have you seen driving down the road, parking up outside of Co-op and racing around a track? What the actual. They pay their equivalent of VED for their industry, such a strange thing to bring up. OH DO ROCKET SHIPZ PAY VED? NO? WELL THERE WE GO THEN. Have the school holidays started early or something? Well this is Awkward

Most horses and riders ARE insured. They don't have to be by law, but most people don't take the risk as they know they can't afford the vets / repair / legal / hospital bills if something goes wrong. Horse crap isn't a fine like dog crap because it won't ruin your life. Horse crap isn't a fine / sentence like litter because it rots away and isn't killing wildlife or damaging the environment. There have been a few comments about having to dodge horse crap when driving a car / riding a bike. If you dodge crap and crash, you were going too fast, no sympathy. If you don't dodge, hit the crap and crash, you were going too fast, no sympathy. If you don't dodge, hit the crap and are complaining about cleaning your car, you need to get a life... Sh1t happens! Edited: Fixed typo. ive come off a motorbike because of gravel that was randomly dumped at 20mph in a 30 was i going to fast no now my bike ended up on the pavement granted its not a fireblade was a Reiju Rs2nkd so not alot but i think 100kg of bike doing 20mph could hurt someone, so as a result of @*!# on the road two people could in worse case scenario be dead, also it isnt littering so i can now go dump them hedge trimming all on the road and path because it rots away awesome

to be fair it is 100% legal to ride two abreast, but i think there must be a limit as 6-7 feet between them is taking the ****

Just saying from my point of view its very unjustified, and know one seems to be able to justify it just state its the rules im not debating its the rules im debating it doesnt make sense from a large picture of everything else that's governed i have posted nothing to keep anyone else happy and do not appriciate you changing my quotes to read as such for the record i agree on the most part that it doesnt make sense and i have already posted something to that affect.. perhaps you could 'quote me happy' on that instead of putting words in my mouth? the mist has dropped and you taken a step to far look at some of the posts in 'the whats next thread' thread ekona and docwra said they hate tons of text being quoted so i did that not as if your trying to make them happy sorry if you saw it that way

get the GTc that were just posted

like i said aliveboy posted about Ved / Road tax and i tongue in check mentioned in to be fair a round about face that its silly to be called a vehicle emission tax to which you replied ...Silly argument, There was no argument it was just a comment but i thought if he wants one ill go get some logs for the fire and now were here, with every point you made i found a floor and you can say the same this is happened with me and mouthwash over Mpss it was a debate then docwra said im palm facing myself after he stated power stations dont pay emmision tax which i think is hilarious and that its for tax of emission of vehicle on a public accessible network, well the public waterways as you say have a license weather it be Or this The fact is the license is the same £28 so why doesnt the VED apply to them as its the same principle why does this pay less than this Just saying from my point of view its very unjustified, and know one seems to be able to justify it just state its the rules im not debating its the rules im debating it doesnt make sense from a large picture of everything else that's governed