martinmac Posted December 31, 2008 Posted December 31, 2008 For those who are interested in such details. http://www.rri.se/index.php?DN=29&List=M-N Quote
martinmac Posted December 31, 2008 Author Posted December 31, 2008 Nearly 8000 posts so I feel the need to post something useful sometimes Quote
ZMANALEX Posted December 31, 2008 Posted December 31, 2008 Nearly 8000 posts so I feel the need to post something useful sometimes Suppose you do have a point Quote
Chris`I Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 Good find matey. Posted it to my Evo owning friend to show our lovely torque curve vs his Quote
ALT Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 This is very consistent with the results for my car. Still curious why the Zed only produces 90% of the specified power and torque output, while other cars seem to be able to achieve their specs. Is there an error in the calculations, did Nissan just lie, or is there some way to get back that extra 10% performance? Quote
matth76 Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 The wheel horse power figures on top and then the power figures at the fly/engine underneath - hence the top figures will be lower. The 10% loss would just refer to the transmission losses which is absolutely normal. bhp (power at the fly) will always be higher. Either way factory power figures are never spot on - at least 5-10bhp either way, depending on conditions too etc. Quote
kernow zed Posted July 6, 2015 Posted July 6, 2015 Just had my car tested. 246 whp and 269 fhp so only a loss of 9% Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.