No they both suck. Porsche is a sports car company (allegedly) and yet they've built a 4x4 and a "sports" car that is slower than a Honda Civic Type R
So what does that make Nissan who build a bit of everthing?
Fair question....no good answer
I guess I get upset, for no good reason, that Porsche markets itself so heavily on being a premium sports brand that is essentially an aspiration marque. They have created, love them or loathe them, some of the finest engineering products money can buy. And then they produce these two models, so obviously dictated by the marketing dept over what the engineering could have achieved and somehow illusions that I held on what they stood for are broken. It's irrational, because clearly they're a business that wants to grow and they'll do that any way they can, and that's how BMW etc. have done so well over the last few decades. My point, if there is one, is simply that these two cars are flawed examples from a line that is otherwise simply superb, and for my money, they're an anathema to the vision of the every-day super car. Nissan, by contrast, has created some very good "bog standard" cars that you wouldn't look twice at and occasionally pulls a rabbit out of the hat by creating something like the Z cars that totally go against the grain. In fact that's probably as good an explanation as I can give, both have done something up expected it's just that Nissan's is entirely welcome whilst the Porsche "innovations" really aren't.....does that make sense? As flackmonkey says, marmite flavoured toothpaste.