Removed Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 good luck with them! let us know please mate! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lomoto Posted March 10, 2006 Author Share Posted March 10, 2006 good luck with them! let us know please mate! Finally got round to putting the other set of wheels on with my new Falkens I cant believe its the same car , all that horrible tyre noise gone and after just a short blast I can tell they grip much better than the Bridgestones (yes even though their new and not scrubbed ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Removed Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 told ya anything is better than the RE040 mate Let us know when you've got more miles on it too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorky Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Just out of interest, what is it about the Bridgestones that people don't like - is it just the wet grip? beacause I only take my car out in dry conditions, and I have no complaints at all with the std. tyres - my car seems to stick to the road very well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lomoto Posted March 12, 2006 Author Share Posted March 12, 2006 Just out of interest, what is it about the Bridgestones that people don't like - is it just the wet grip? beacause I only take my car out in dry conditions, and I have no complaints at all with the std. tyres - my car seems to stick to the road very well mine with the Bridges on just let go all the time in the DRY . I would class them as a very dangerous tyre ,I,m suprised Nissan has not had a few claims against them ,especially in the States Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Removed Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 tbh I don't mind them in the dry, it's the understeer in just damp conditions that is horrible, as well as general wet handling. That's my opinion anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lomoto Posted March 12, 2006 Author Share Posted March 12, 2006 And dont forget the tyre noise from them as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revsport Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 I hated the Bridgestones as they grip like soap. Now on 19" with 275 at the rear. Dunlop sp9000 they grip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cefiro_drifter Posted April 3, 2006 Share Posted April 3, 2006 Maybe the reason the "drifters" use them is because they have little or no grip?? (I have no personal experience of them - just a thought) maybe a bit of a shock but drifters need just as much grip to drift as they need no grip.. the better the tyre the better it wll drift as rubbish tyres will flex, melt move and warp all over the place making it very hard to drift.. think the main reason wy falkens are popular is coz there price and the quality are very very good ( only thing i found close is the dunlop eagle F1 poteza thingys and ,aybe the bridgesotne SO3's but they are all double the price ) i just bought 2x 215/40/17 and 2x 225/35/17 and paid a lil over 200 delivered and that was from falken andnot a discount tyre warehouse.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rish Posted April 3, 2006 Share Posted April 3, 2006 Just out of interest, what is it about the Bridgestones that people don't like - is it just the wet grip? beacause I only take my car out in dry conditions, and I have no complaints at all with the std. tyres - my car seems to stick to the road very well Im not an expert mate, but I ve found the bridgestones to be good enough in the dry, esp if you can get them warm enough. In the wet though, different story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.