itsLeon

Let your tuner check if he can see in the logs of the value of the clutch changes when pressed/depressed.

New livery

Added a small update to the car, increasing the HP by 5

Here are two N/A Builds you might wanna follow so that gives you an idea what is needed to get that power level https://www.350z-uk.com/topic/124653-ow-no-another-na-build/ https://www.350z-uk.com/topic/110772-fast-roadtrack-350z-37ltr-hr-build/

No it's not. It's a VE (Volumetric efficiency) map, if i leave that blank no fuel would be injected. Uprev uses a different method for delivering fuel (forgot the name)

AFR target: Fuel map: Timing: Closed loop settings (o2 control):

Im only targeting 16.7 at low rpm and load. This is because of the cams, the have a big overlap so the fuel that gets injected some part of it leaves directly into the exhaust. Also 14.7 is not some holy number to focus on (its only for emmisions) and with the installed EGT sensors i can monitor if its not getting to hot. The OEM ecu is only in closed loop when the target is 14.7 after that i goes to open loop. Once my engine reaches higher rpm/load to numbers are accurate its just for the idle that i target leaner then normal. (when idling i can see my afr move from 15.5 to 17.4 its not steady at all until closed loops kicks in, then is more or less around the targeted afr)

I always log when my car is running so yeah i do have the log files. But i don't understand your question about if the trace closely to the closed loop afr? First there is no closed loop afr, you have set the afr targets as you want across different RPM's and engine load, for example my car is targeting an afr of 16.7 at idle because at 14.7 it was way to rich (could smell and see the fuel out of my exhaust) Second you set the closed loop control as you want. Mine is set to be only in closed loop below 3000 rpm and below x load. I can run the car completely at open loop if i want, everything is dialed in to be around 5% of the target AFR i want.

Owwww! Didnt even remember just the normal stuff of exhaust, intake, testpipes i think it was

well that is optional. My car runs 2 widebands sensors connected to a haltech ECU i didn't see any reason to connect a third just for the dyno graph

Cosworth: 11:1 Eagle rods: Cat cams 290 duration 12mm lift (IN) 274 duration 12mm lift (EX) 3.5inch intake 75mm Throttlebody

Guy's i really dont care how much HP its making and if the numbers are correct. The dyno is only a tool for use and not a precise measuring device. There are so many corrections/settings that will influence the numbers its showing. I only care if it is making more power then before.

Well that might be true that the build motor is making less torque then the stock motor at low rpm. My engine is using 290 duration cams with 12mm lift so we had to turn off vvt (that is making power at low rpm) the manufacturer has warned me about is that these cams don't like 3000rpm and below. But I did some research about the dyno last night and most owners of these dyno's use a 15% hp correction for drive train losses we had it set on 5%

No this is engine power and not wheel. We haven't use this dyno much for power sweeps so must of the settings are still on default, incorrect calibrated. So many correction settings are still on the low side and we just updated the software with many new features so still figuring out all the settings. We use this dyno for a base line run and then see how much we can HP we an add and mostly for the tuning part. Will start looking at the new settings and do the run over to see if it gets different results.

@350Butcher do you have by any change a dyno sheet? Would like to compare it to mine.