Jump to content

Peak 370

Members
  • Posts

    280
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Peak 370

  1. 350Z was cheap as chips when it came out and a big plus was a 3.5 V6 engine. Muscle car looks and rwd.

    Yes, it and the 370 don't have silky motors that rev way high but then they are well priced.

     

    FWD cars have come a long way, my Integra 2.0 was fantastic handling. As was my Focus RS.

  2. Dynamic Turtle. You like the M3 CSL then I would guess?

    I had a 53 plate with air con but no other options.

    Call me mad but I hated the massive intake drone from the huge carbon air box after a while.

    Fun when going for it, pretty quick if peaky.

    But every small overtake meant a loud noise that everyone looked round at.

    Overpriced too.

  3. Porsches unreliable? Well I had a 2003 996 turbo that had seen 6 previous owners and had 103,000 miles on the clock when I bought it.

    The owner two back from me had remapped it mildly to around 550 bhp.

    An independent dealer serviced it for me and other than a litre of oil every 1500 miles I had no issues in 12,000 miles hard use.

    I put 16,000 miles on my Cayman S with no bother.

  4. Modified 370Z and GTR too thirsty, he does a lot of miles.

     

    Anyways up, he bought a December '13 Merc A45AMG and we went out in it last night. A tad of expected turbo lag but huge shove that shocks for a car with under 2 litres. Closest thing would be my 390 bhp Lancer Evo. Similar power delivery.

    Ride is incredibly firm but otherwise a great all rounder. 5 doors, Good boot. Economical. M3 V8 performance.

    £35K but as an AMG will hold value well.

  5. If anyone here thinks a 370Z is dear to run, try a Lancer Evolution, like my remapped 2009 MR FQ 360 1X.

     

    Ferrari-style costs for servicing, tax, insurance, fuel.

     

    4,500 mile intervals at £350 a time. Top road tax. 18 mpg generally and once I got NINE mpg in Germany, having some fun.

    Tyres every other month. The 370Z is a pussycat, a cheap to run one by comparison!!

  6. My Cayman S was fully loaded and was £50K in 2007. I bought it in 2012.

    Yes, a post-2009 on is better than a 370 but at almost twice the price it should be.

     

    Running costs high? Just had a service at Nissan Mansfield, £184. (My wife's Audi S3 cost her £420 last month).

    Insurance under £200 a year.

    Tyres? No worse than any rwd muscle car.

     

    The fact it is £10,000 to £20,000 cheaper than most of the competition negates the tax, etc.

    • Like 2
  7. Some turbo diesels are under-quoted by the factory, some turbo petrols are the same. This is mainly for insurance purposes, as they don't want their cars to be only insurable by those who have already chosen what flowers and songs they want at their funeral next year.

    My Megane 175 (bhp) DCi had 186 bhp and was 20 lbs-ft up on claimed figures.

     

    Some n/a cars seem to be less powerful than claimed. My S2000 had way under the 240 bhp Honda said.

    As did my R32 Golf.

  8. Just found a review of 4 cars, inc the 370Z. Others were 135i, RX8 and a Pontiac.

     

    The 370Z ran out top! They only really disliked the poor view out of the sides and rear, for parking etc., but loved the engine, handling and looks. Slightly harsh engine, which we know about at high revs also.

     

    Looks and performance of a Cayman S for little more than half the money, they said.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...