k9l3

i would say a 350 brake 350z is a nice enough power to make it worthwhile

That used to belong to 2 forum members. 350bhp? not a chance Less lag? What lag i knew it wouldnt be 350 without t or sc but looks nice but with them mods will it be reliable i see you had supercharger was it reliable?

what about this car these are 2 i am looking at http://pistonheads.co.uk/sales/3462999.htm its had the rev up added could that be a bad thing as heard they had problems

ok is that a bad sign of not being done properly? or because it wouldnt fit with supercharger

hi all anyone know this 350z for sale and if its any good http://pistonheads.co.uk/sales/3536059.htm http://pistonheads.co.uk/sales/3536059.htm

yeh you sound like some good guys the rx8 people when i went on there where aload of idiots, s2k worse on fuel then a manaro hmmm you sure you not drunk i think your wrong there mate thats just silly iknow if you rag the car its going to drink bad but normal driving has to be pretty good. and as stated above with the s2k being a soft top that is also a added bonus as i know in the summer its lovely having a convertible.

yeh you sound like some good guys the rx8 people when i went on there where aload of idiots, s2k worse on fuel then a manaro hmmm you sure you not drunk i think your wrong there mate thats just silly iknow if you rag the car its going to drink bad but normal driving has to be pretty good. and as stated above with the s2k being a soft top that is also a added bonus as i know in the summer its lovely having a convertible.

too be honest you all really swayin me to the s2k. which is very surprising but I appreciat the honesty.. by the sounds of it the s2k is a bit special where as the 350 is a nicer car to be in because the size. also sound wise I didn't think the z sounded that great also it didn't sound rubbish but the way everyone went on regarding the note of the engine I was not feeling it. in a way for a 2 litre na the s2k is a much better performer compared to the 350z needing a heavy v6 lump. also I always found v6 cars to be real thirsty compared to 4 pot or straight 6. I think after all what you lot have said I would go for the s2k aslong as I feel good in it and the way it drives.

too be honest you all really swayin me to the s2k. which is very surprising but I appreciat the honesty.. by the sounds of it the s2k is a bit special where as the 350 is a nicer car to be in because the size. also sound wise I didn't think the z sounded that great also it didn't sound rubbish but the way everyone went on regarding the note of the engine I was not feeling it. in a way for a 2 litre na the s2k is a much better performer compared to the 350z needing a heavy v6 lump. also I always found v6 cars to be real thirsty compared to 4 pot or straight 6. I think after all what you lot have said I would go for the s2k aslong as I feel good in it and the way it drives.

just seen some of the last threads didn't notice the next page. regarding daily commute and size I am 6 foot so if it feels to small which was putting me of also with the s then that won't be good. I thought the z4 would be bigger ?

just seen some of the last threads didn't notice the next page. regarding daily commute and size I am 6 foot so if it feels to small which was putting me of also with the s then that won't be good. I thought the z4 would be bigger ?

well that was a lot of help from all of you I must say thanks:) in someway sounds a lot like the s2000 is a really good car. I like the 350z for its looks and its presence but seems like such good things about the s2000 and the better mpg. I wish in a way that the 350z was turbo and it would of done it for me over the s. I must say the s has to get a kit to make it look less girly and more of a car. my opinion obviously. the supra is not as good to drive then the 350z no way but felt special driving it. for me the supra was like an addiction only car I never got bored of. but not a cheap car to run. and they getting older now. I will try do test drive of the s next week and see how good it is. the rx8 I would love but heard only bad things about them that's why they so cheap. I could buy 2008 for same as some 2003 z's thanks everyone

well that was a lot of help from all of you I must say thanks:) in someway sounds a lot like the s2000 is a really good car. I like the 350z for its looks and its presence but seems like such good things about the s2000 and the better mpg. I wish in a way that the 350z was turbo and it would of done it for me over the s. I must say the s has to get a kit to make it look less girly and more of a car. my opinion obviously. the supra is not as good to drive then the 350z no way but felt special driving it. for me the supra was like an addiction only car I never got bored of. but not a cheap car to run. and they getting older now. I will try do test drive of the s next week and see how good it is. the rx8 I would love but heard only bad things about them that's why they so cheap. I could buy 2008 for same as some 2003 z's thanks everyone

Hi all i looking at getting a s2000 or 350z maybe i also like the z4 3.0i but its not japanese and would like to still goto the jap shows especially as my dad still has his gto. i changing from a supra so i know none of these cars will compare in performance even mine was standard. but i like all 3 but only driven a 2006 350z which didnt excite me too much but was very nice to drive i must say. so i know most will be biased on here agaist the others but would like to see what people think or if have driven all 3. what is the most reliable and best performance? Please

Hi all i looking at getting a s2000 or 350z maybe i also like the z4 3.0i but its not japanese and would like to still goto the jap shows especially as my dad still has his gto. i changing from a supra so i know none of these cars will compare in performance even mine was standard. but i like all 3 but only driven a 2006 350z which didnt excite me too much but was very nice to drive i must say. so i know most will be biased on here agaist the others but would like to see what people think or if have driven all 3. what is the most reliable and best performance? Please

as stunning as your car looks i didnt manage to sell car on ebay so thats why i going to part x with cash i have offered a guy mine plus 1400 but waiting for reply and the car i was going to get is too far auto trader said 170mile when i checked the proper driving distance it was 240 so i leaving it. otherwise i would deffo made you a offer

liking the colour of your z on your banner if thats your car looks very nice

Thanks everyone for the welcome. The 350z felt good in 1st and second gear then felt bit of slouch but is nice car to drive and still jap. And Ye handling should be much better. I will miss the looks of my supra especially as that front bumper is very rare and in my opinion about the best to look at? And the speed of it is amazing I have beat porshe turbos aston Martin's kept with a new m3. 0-60 is not the best but 40+ was amazing pace for standard. I will prob miss the attention at shows aswell

dont worry i nkow the rules i wont. i px in anyway now that pic was at the jae

Hi all looking to get a 350z maybe next week and will be part x with my supra tt . is there anything to worry about with the z and are they reliable? read good reviews and i have test drove a 2006 model, i am looking at getting 2003 but anything to be aware of